Are Hunts Using Birds of Prey Properly? ; Letters

Summary

---

A recent report published by the RSPB expressed concern at the number of birds of prey being illegally poisoned. I am aware that some peregrines have been killed by gamekeepers, but I am especially concerned about the injuries or death of falcons used by the hunting fraternity to comply with, or circumvent, the Hunting Act 2004.

The Act makes it an offence for a person to hunt a wild mammal with a dog, unless his hunting is exempt. One exemption relates to falconry. It reads: "Flushing a wild mammal from cover is exempt hunting if undertaken for the purpose of enabling a bird of prey to hunt the wild mammal..." Several Hunts in England and Wales keep falcons for this purpose, as it enables them to legally use a pack of hounds without contravening the legislation. I have never been convinced that a falcon in England would, or could, hunt or attack a fox despite being told by hunt supporters that this is what happens. Do readers of the WMN have any views on this matter? Falcons allegedly used by Hunts must be regarded as domestic or captive birds and, therefore, are protected by law. If the owners of these birds allowed them to become involved in a fight with hounds a prosecution could, in my opinion, be brought under the Animal Welfare Act 2006. This Act imposes a duty of care, on those responsible for animals, to prevent unnecessary suffering.

See the full content of this document

Extract

---

Are Hunts Using Birds of Prey Properly? ; Letters

Joh...

See the full content of this document

---